|
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
"Folk songs are songs of anonymous origin that are transmitted orally. They are frequently a major aspect of national or cultural identity. Art songs often become folk songs when people forget who the author was. Folk songs are also frequently transmitted nonorally, especially in the modern era."
This whole area of the evolution and communication of popular music is interesting to memetics theorists, BTW.
I think the best thing to do would be to simply create a third category: "art", "folk", and "popular" songs. Also, we would then include non-western songs in "folk". Currently, the only mention that people with vocal chords, and songs to sing, exist outside of Europe is at the end of the "Song forms" section, where they are described as "ethnic", "indigenous" or "aboriginal". Jeez. Its nearing 5AM though, so I'll sleep on it. - Hyacinth 11:28, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Or....I won't sleep on it.Hyacinth
I'd like to weigh in for the three-way taxonomy Art/Folk/Popular, as Hyacinth suggested. The current articles on Classical music helps clarify the Art/Popular distinction, and the articles on Folk music and Popular music discuss the Popular/Folk distinction. I think it would also help if Folk music is augmented to clarify the Art/Folk distinction.
Pretty much everything can be fitted into these three, I think, though of course there are many blends (Art/Folk: Sacred Harp music; Art/Popular: Philip Glass; Folk/Popular: Joan Baez).
"Commercium", though interesting, is a much narrower category, so I've moved it to be a link. Opus33 23:24, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)
![]() Related items |
![]() Related items |
![]() Related items |
![]() Related items | ||||
![]() Related items |
![]() Related items |
![]() Related items |
![]() Related items | ||||
![]() Related items |