Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design A Short History of Nearly Everything Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Creationism: Held August 4-9, 2003, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA: Technical Symposium Sessions Creation Vs. Evolution (Examine the Evidence) Evolution, Creationism, and Other Modern Myths: A Critical Inquiry Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism Battle For The Beginning The Creation Hypothesis: Scientific Evidence for an Intelligent Designer

• Statement on creationism.
• The Academy sees no objection to the teaching of creationism in schools as part of a course in dogmatic or comparative religion, or in some other non-scientific context. There are no grounds, however, for requiring that creationism be taught as part of a science course. ...
• Science and creationism (US National Academy of Sciences) .

• Creationism? .
• THE EVOLUTION OF CREATIONISM .
• The Kansas decision has now boosted the issue of "scientific creationism" into the presidential campaign, where the candidates' comments have demonstrated a disappointing lack of knowledge about the tenets of evolution and the legal decisions regarding the teaching of creationism. ...
• The Academy emphasized that evolution, the most important concept in modern biology, must be a vital part of science instruction and that lessons on creationism do not belong in science classes. ...
• WHAT IS CREATIONISM? .
• None of these forms of creationism can be reconciled with scientific evidence from biology, geology, biochemistry, paleontology, biogeography, embyrology, and many other relevant fields. ...
• Most people thought the Scopes Monkey trial of 1925 settled the issue of teaching evolution in our schools, but that has not prevented creationists from continuing their fight to make creationism part of the science curriculum. Since a scientific defense of creationism would be difficult to mount, creationists focus on attacking evolution. ...
• OTHER ARGUMENTS made to promote the teaching of creationism in public schools are based on an "equal treatment" approach: .
• Since there are flaws in the theory of evolution, doesn't that prove creationism deserves attention? Most "flaws" are based on misrepresentation or denial of facts. ...
• The National Academy of Science has stated: "When the evidence for creationism has been subjected to the tests of the scientific method, it has been found invalid. ... Creationism is a legitimate topic for religion, history, literature or philosophy class -- not science. ...
• WHAT DO THE COURTS SAY ABOUT EVOLUTION & CREATIONISM? .

• What is Creationism? .
• Pennock's Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism (MIT.
• What is Creationism? from the Talk. ...
• Lecure notes on creationism from Dr. ...
• Creationism in the broad sense.
• Creationism in the narrow sense: .
• Young earth creationism .
• Old earth creationism: .
• THE CREATION/EVOLUTION CONTINUUM from Eugenie Scott Flat Earthers Geocentrists Young Earth Creationists (Omphalos) Old Earth Creationists (Gap Creationism) (Day-Age Creationism) (Progressive Creationism) (Intelligent Design Creationism) Evolutionary Creationists Theistic Evolutionists Methodological Materialistic Evolutionists Philosophical Materialistic Evolutionists .
• creationism and recapitulation and vestigial structures.

• A Theory of Creationism.
• For some predictions based on creationism, see Creatioist Predictions. ...

• The New Creationism: Biology Under Attack .
• The result is an ideological outlook eerily similar to that of religious creationism. ...
• The new secular creationism emerged as an understandable reaction to excess. ...
• It was only with the arrival of the intellectual movements lumped under the term "postmodernism" that academic antibiologism began to sound perilously like religious creationism. ...
• The deepest motives behind this new secular version of creationism are understandable. ...
• The new creationism is not simply a case of well-intended politics gone awry; it represents a grave misunderstanding of biology and science generally. ...
• In fact, in the extreme constructivist scenario borrowed by secular creationists, it's hard to imagine who would have the will or the ability to orchestrate real change: the people in power, who have no motivation to alter the status quo, or the oppressed, whose choices, preferences and sentiments have been so thoroughly shaped by the cultural hegemony of the elite? Judged solely as a political stance, secular creationism is no less pessimistic than the biologism it seeks to uproot. ...

• Frighteningly, however, the Christian side of the Web seems to be dominated by folk of Creationist beliefs, as any search on any search engine using 'theistic evolution' or 'creationism' will show you. ...
• My concern is not with creationism per se (if your theology leads you unavoidably to a literal interpretation of the early parts of Genesis than that's fine), but rather with the errors propagated within Creationism, and especially the Young Earth variety. ...
• It was only later I came across what was for me the strange phenomenon of Creationism.
• An important difference between theistic evolution and creationism is that theistic evolution is not part of our theology. ...
• I would have liked 'creationism' to mean merely affirming of the Christian (and indeed Islamic and Judaistic) Creation doctrine, that God is the Creator of all things - Patrem omnipotentem, factorem cæli et terræ, et omnium visibilium et invisibilium - which all orthodox Christians affirm. ...
• Is Creationism Consistent?.
• this is about the lie that both atheists and fundamentalists sell you - that you have to choose between atheistic evolution and Christian creationism. ...
• Does Jesus Force us to Accept Young Earth Creationism.
• ASA members now have a range of views across a spectrum from old earth creationism to theistic evolution. ...
• Critiques of Young-Earth Creationism.
• Creationism is not Science .
• Why Creationism is not worthy of the name 'science'. ...
• The Flood in Creationism.
• A very good analysis of Creationism. ...
• Greene's Creationism Truth Filter .
• Funny thing is, when you try to filter the truth out of Creationism, everything goes straight through the filter paper.

• Cloning Creationism in Turkey.
• To observers in the industrialized Western world, "scientific creationism" often seems an American phenomenon. In other English-speaking countries, creationism has a much smaller constituency, and though orthodox Israeli Jews or French Muslims occasionally make a stand against Darwin (Numbers 1992; Kepel 1997), creationism has not become the persistent nuisance for public education that it is in the United States. Even within the United States, creationism typical of that promoted by the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) is clearly a sectarian position, drawing support from the evangelical Protestant community but largely unable to reach beyond its boundaries. Tracing the history of US creationism, we find that it is rooted in a populist Protestant culture that demands that both nature and Scripture be accessible to common-sense interpretation (Gilbert 1997). ...
• Since "scientific creationism" has such a narrow, if numerous, constituency, defenders of evolution in science education can often succeed by appealing to pluralist principles — allowing creationism into the classroom would favor a blatantly sectarian viewpoint. Although ICR separates "biblical" from "scientific" creationism and emphasizes the latter, evolutionists usually consider this an artificial distinction; after all, the supposedly scientific aspect of creationism is endorsed by few people who are not biblical literalists. ...
• While this is a reasonably accurate picture of "creation science" in the Western world, the emergence of an Islamic creationism, which is practically a clone of ICR´s "scientific" vision, means we have to reassess our picture of creationism. Though Turkish creationists hail from a very different religious culture and history, their wholesale adoption of ICR-style arguments means that we cannot explain creationism by narrowly sectarian factors alone. Creationism mobilizes traditional Abrahamic convictions about the moral significance of the natural world against the threat of social modernity. Hence successful variants of creationism have a potential to spread beyond the environments in which they originally evolved. ...
• A New Wave of Turkish Creationism .
• The aftermath of a military coup in 1980 presented new opportunities for Islamist politics and for creationism. ...
• In this highly charged environment, 1998 brought a new wave of creationism to Turkey. ...
• These meetings were well-attended and well-publicized, producing successful, organized media events for creationism. ...
• The content of Turkish creationism, then, is strikingly unoriginal; with generally trivial modifications, much of ICR´s "scientific" material fits BAV´s needs very well. ...

• The End of Creationism?.
• That should be, but won't be, the end of creationism. ...
• Far from refuting creationism, genome research has raised vexing problems for contemporary evolutionary theory.

• Young-Earth Creationism .
• A Grand Canyon that is millions of years old is a clear refutation of young-Earth Creationism. ...
• Is it possible that the young-Earth Creationists are right? That the Grand Canyon really is compatible with young-Earth Creationism?.

• The Wild, Wild World of Creationism .
• Maculate Deception: The "Science" of Creationism .
• Is Creationism Science? .
• One of the more curious artifacts of this murky realm of supernatural belief is so-called Scientific Creationism, a Quixotic quest to balance the fundamentalist interpretations of the Judeo-Christian bible with the findings of modern science. ...
• The Wild, Wild World of Creationism .
• Creationism's advocates espouse more wacky ideas than you would imagine -- but they are winning the fight for the education of the next generation. ...
• Just as it is impossible for a fool to be wise, so too is it impossible for creationism to be science. ...
• Maculate Deception: The "Science" of Creationism .
• Is Creationism Science? Transcript from a radio debate between Frank Zindler and Duane Gish. ...
• Is Creationism Science?.
• Wild World of Creationism.

• Creationism, & Foreign Language Pages.
• Creationism - More to Come!.

• General Evolutionism and Creationism Resources.
• Creationism Home Page Fossil Hominids FAQ The Talk. ...

• SCIENCE AND CREATIONISM HOME.
• Science and Creationism.

• 'Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics': Supernatural Selection.
• In the last decade or so, creationism has grown sophisticated. ...
• ''Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics'' is a great fat collection of essays, some three dozen in all, that examine this thesis from every imaginable angle. ...

•   About > Religion & Spirituality > Agnosticism/Atheism > About Creationism .
• Creationism.
• About Creationism.
• About Creationism.
• What is Creationism? What arguments do creationists offer in their critiques of evlution? What are intelligent design and catastrophism?.
• What is Creationism?.
• Like evolution, creationism can have more than one meaning. At its most basic, creationism is the belief that the universe was created by a deity of some sort - but after that, there is quite a lot of variety among creationists as to just what they believe and why. ...
• Henry Morris responds to objections to teaching creationism in public schools, arguing that scientific creationism is not based on the Bible.
• Creationism and The Flood .
• Critiques of Creationism .
• Creationism and Dishonesty .
• Creationism Debates .
• • Evolution & Creationism: Issues, Science, and Religion.

• 12/95 : Alabama Will Use Schoolbooks to Spread Lies and Foster Creationism .

• Creationism is a faith-based belief that the genesis of life is due to a divine creator. In its most ardent form, creationism insists that the universe is about 6,000 years old (not more than 10 billion, as scientists say), that every species was formed by the creator in its present form, and that Noah's flood caused most of the havoc in the geological record. ...
• Whether called creationism, "scientific creationism" or by various other labels, creationism is a fundamentalist Christian belief. The Institute for Creation Research, a primary node of creationism, says it "was originally formed as the research division of Christian Heritage College. ...
• The teaching of creationism in public schools has been outlawed by the U. ... Unable to compel the teaching of creationism, Kansas and various other jurisdictions have "solved" the problem by rendering evolution optional, or compelling teachers to describe it as one of several theories of the origin of biological diversity. ...

• Information Theory and Creationism.

• --40423DCD-WebSite-Rules-Byte-Range-Data-40423DCD Content-type: text/html Content-length: 27127 Last-modified: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 20:17:20 GMT Content-Range: bytes 0-27126/27127 Creationism & Darwinism,.

• Creationism as a Modern Social Movement .
• The term progressive creationism would most accurately describe the view of most of those who have dominated the movement. ...
• The influential education magazine Learning in its February, 1981 issue featured the creation-evolution controversy as the lead article, and was highlighted by a cover depicting a tombstone and the words "Creationism:" Died in 1925 -- Reborn in 1981. ...
• Creationism is the belief that the basic forms of life were intelligently designed by a being that is on a higher order than humans, and is thus transcendent to humans (Johnson, 1991). ... After this book took the world by storm creationism "rapidly lost ground" (Numbers, 1991, p. ... Conversely, among conservative and moderate Christians, Jews and Moslems, special creationism has remained strong (Morris, 1989; Overman, 1966; Neel, 1942; Kawaguchi, 1914). Studies consistently show that over half of all persons in America align themselves with special creationism, and most of the rest accept some form of progressive creationism or theistic evolution (Gallup poll 1992, Gallup and Poling, 1980; Bergman, 1980). ...
• George Frederick Wright, was a geologist who slowly moved from theistic evolution to creationism (Numbers, 1988). ...
• Some generalizations about the 1900-1970 creation-science writers and leaders include: the range of theological opinions as well as the beliefs about creationism that these individuals held was enormous, and very few of them fit into the stereotype of a conservative, short-age creationist world view (Wirth and Bergman, 1993). ... 291) in a review of Morris's History of Modern Creationism notes, "knows everybody who was anybody in creationism, and he knows who did what to whom. ...
• Many, like Wright, tended to favor the progressive creationism taught by Guyot and Dana, in which a relatively small number of creative acts punctuated an otherwise natural developmental process. The views of George McCready Price, who was already laying the foundation for "scientific creationism" by advocating a recent special creation in six days and a worldwide deluge that buried the fossils, enjoyed only limited circulation, mostly among his fellow Seventh-day Adventists. ...
• " The numerous schisms within the various creation groups and their inability to cooperate with each other is one reason why creationism has achieved such dismal success among both the educated public-at-large as well as in the courts (Wonderly, 1990). ...
• Because creationism is most often associated with the fundamentalist movement, a review of the movement's background and beliefs is necessary to understand the development of creationism. ...
• Nelson was the vice president, Whitney the secretary treasurer, and Price, evidently because of his visibility which resulted from the controversy over his open stand for creationism, thought it best for the organization that he serve only as a director.
• Creationism as a Modern Social Movement.

• Information Theory and Creationism:.

• THE TENETS OF CREATIONISM.
• Creationism can be studied and taught in any of three basic forms, as follows:.
• (1) Scientific creationism (no reliance on Biblical revelation, utilizing only scientific data to support and expound the creation model). (2) Biblical creationism (no reliance on scientific data, using only the Bible to expound and defend the creation model). (3) Scientific Biblical creationism (full reliance on Biblical revelation but also using scientific data to support and develop the creation model). ... For example, creationists should not advocate that Biblical creationism be taught in public schools, both because of judicial restrictions against religion in such schools and also (more importantly) because teachers who do not believe the Bible should not be asked to teach the Bible. It is both legal and desirable, however, that scientific creationism be taught in public schools as a valid alternative to evolutionism.
• In a Sunday School class, on the other hand, dedicated to teaching the Scriptures and "all the counsel of God," Biblical creationism should be strongly expounded and emphasized as the foundation of all other doctrine. In a Christian school or college, where the world of God is studied in light of the Word of God, it is appropriate and very important to demonstrate that Biblical creationism and scientific creationism are fully compatible, two sides of the same coin, as it were. The creation revelation in Scripture is thus supported by all true facts of nature; the combined study can properly be called scientific Biblical creationism. ...
• These can, in fact, be developed as a series of formal tenets2 of scientific creationism and Biblical creationism, respectively, as listed below:.
• Tenets of Scientific Creationism.
• Tenets of Biblical Creationism.
• Even though the tenets of scientific creationism can be expounded quite independently of the tenets of Biblical creationism, the two systems are completely compatible. All the genuine facts of science support Biblical creationism and all statements in the Bible are consistent with scientific creationism. ...
• 1 See Scientific Creationism, ed. ...

• Editorial: The New Creationism and Its Threat to Science Literacy and Education.
• The most publicly contentious issue in science—the teaching of evolution— illustrates the point: About half of those surveyed by NSF do not believe humans evolved from earlier species, and two-thirds think that creationism should be taught alongside evolution in public schools. ...
• These encouraging signs tend to get lost in the ongoing hullabaloo over “intelligent design creationism” (IDC). Creationism—and this is true of all its guises—is an antiscientific worldview. ...
• Although the IDC propaganda machine is focused on getting creationism in the public schools, this Trojan horse hides a more concerted attack against science education in general. ...
• AIBS, in collaboration with the National Center for Science Education, is working to meet the challenge of creationism (see www. ...

• Evolution and Creationism — .
• Sites describing and/or promoting creationism.
• The Kansas Decision and other recent creationism vs. ...
• Participate in the debate by teaching a class — GSA Treasurer David Dunn provides a syllabus and annotated bibliography for his University of Texas at Dallas course Geology Refutes Creationism.

• Outcry at creationism in UK schools.
• Outcry at creationism in UK schools .
• The Vardy Foundation's announcement that it is to open six new schools has sparked fresh debate over the teaching of creationism. ...
• But the Gateshead school, which opened in 1990, has been dogged with controversy because its pupils are taught biblical creationism. ...
• Who is worried about creationism in schools? .
• Is creationism more popular in the US? .
• But teaching creationism is illegal in US schools? .
• Though the supreme court outlawed the teaching of creationism in [state] schools 15 years ago, that hasn't stopped school boards from finding creative ways to smuggle it into the classroom. ...
• Does the US government accept creationism? .
• 2002: Dawkins criticises 'spread' of creationism.
• 2002: Ofsted OK creationism in college.
• 2002: Bishop warns Blair over danger of creationism.
• 2002: Leader: creationism at the taxpayers' expense.

Do you have a great site about Creationism? Is your Creationism site listed here? Would you like a prefered placement of your site in this directory?

It's easy! First place, the HTML from the box below on your page that you would like listed in this directory.

Then use our link submission request with your name, your contact information, and the URL of your site that has a link to this directory. After we verify your link to us, we'll make sure your site stays in our directory, and we'll give it prefered placement here also.

Here is how to make a simple text link to us. Just copy the code in this box to your website:

We can also develop a custom Guide To The Internet for your site. Please request your own custom Guide To The Internet.