From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
See http://www.xrefer.com/entry/591114 .
re ... in contradiction to the normal English rule for abbreviations, what rule are you talking about? I'm very tempted to delete this reference. Eclecticology, Monday, June 17, 2002
I kept that bit when I refactored today, but I don't know either. -- Tarquin
It means what it says: in English, the normal rule for making abbreviations is to use only the first letter of each word, and to ignore 'short words' such as prepositions and conjunctions. Matthew Woodcraft
Some issues:
Is there a generic term for the words like: acronym, initialism, portmanteau ... ? - Olivier
There are a lot of people, including me, who would disagree that the definition of acronym includes only pronounceable words. Insisting on a definition of acronym that excludes initialisms seems like unnecessary bias. --Nohat 00:17 20 Jun 2003 (UTC)
http://www.bartleby.com/65/ab/abbrevia.html quotes the The Columbia Encyclopedia by saying:
Second, the article does mention that defining acronym as only being of the type like NATO is supported by some interpretations of dictionary definitions. However, limiting an article's content to only cover a restrictive dictionary definition is not the point of Wikipedia. Many words have meanings that are not covered in dictionaries but are covered in Wikipedia articles.
Moreover, usage of the broader definition of acronym is overwhelming. "Acronym Lists" invariably contain all types of acronyms, with the exception of a few lists compiled by pedants. Additionally, none of the definitions given above explicitly exclude acronyms like IBM; any perceived exclusion would be implied by use of the word 'word' and all examples' being of the NATO type.
Last, usage of a word in context is a far better measure than a dictionary definition of whether it means something in particular or not. Lexicographers mostly just try to capture the usage they have seen, not prescribe how a word should be used. Absence of a particular definition of a word is not necessarily tantamount to condemning such usage.
It should also be noted that most of the definitions given above would exclude acronyms like radar because they include non-initial letters, but no one has argued that they shouldn't be considered acronyms.
http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutwords/TLA?view= says:
http://www.ucc.ie/cgi-bin/acronym says:
The "Google Glossary" at http://labs.google.com/glossary says:
http://www.wordsmyth.net/live/home.php?script=search&matchent=V-J+Day&matchtype=exact says:
--Nohat 22:35 20 Jun 2003 (UTC)
Ha sanyone else noticed "false acronym syndrome" - the tendency of some companies to encourage everyone to write their names in capitals, as if they were acronyms. For example, ALSTOM and the new MINI? Andy G 04:01, 18 Jan 2004 (UTC)
![]() How to Get on Radio Talk Shows All Across America w/o Leaving Home |
![]() This Broad's Life: The Raucous, Riveting Autobiography of the Most Outrageous Radio Talk-Show Host in America Today |
![]() You Can't Say That : Common Sense From America's Number One Gay Radio Talk Show Host |
![]() How to Get On Radio Talk Shows All Across America | ||||
![]() Talk Show Selects 1999: A Guide to the Nation's Most Influential Television and Radio Talk Shows |
![]() Talk Show Selects 1998: A Guide to the Nation's Most Influential Television and Radio Talk Shows (1998 Edition) |
![]() Talk Show Yearbook 2000: A Guide to the Nation's Most Influential Television and Radio Talk Shows (Talk Show Selects, 2000) |
![]() Conduct a National Radio Talk Show Tour Without Leaving Your Home or Office...Without Paying a Cent for Air Time (How to Make People Buy Whatever You) | ||||